In a surprising revelation, Iran’s top military commander, Major General Mohammad Bagheri, has conceded that the country’s military leaders failed to warn the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, of the possibility of US airstrikes on Iranian targets in early 2020.
According to an exclusive interview with state-run television, General Bagheri attributed the oversight to a misjudgment of the US military’s intentions and capabilities. The admission marks a rare instance of candor from the Iranian military leadership, highlighting tensions within the regime over strategic assessments and decision-making processes.
The incident in question occurred in January 2020, when US President Donald Trump authorized airstrikes against Iranian military bases in retaliation for a devastating drone attack on American forces in Iraq. Although US officials had publicly threatened action against Iranian targets for months prior, General Bagheri claimed that Tehran’s military leaders had genuinely believed that the US would not follow through on such attacks.
“We did not anticipate the US would resort to air raids,” General Bagheri said in the interview. “We thought they would adopt other methods, such as sanctions or diplomatic pressure.” The Iranian military’s assumption, according to General Bagheri, was based on the administration’s public statements and what he described as “incorrect” intelligence assessments.
The failure to warn Khamenei of the potential airstrike has sparked an internal row within the Iranian regime, with some officials accusing the military leadership of complacency and poor analysis. The controversy reflects deeper differences between Iran’s civilian and military establishments over strategic approaches to regional security and the US-Iran standoff.
In the aftermath of the airstrikes, General Bagheri played a key role in orchestrating the Iranian military’s response, including the downing of a US drone and retaliation against US forces in Iraq. However, the incident has also raised questions about the effectiveness of Iran’s military intelligence gathering capabilities and the regime’s ability to anticipate and prepare for potential US aggression.
General Bagheri’s admission is seen as significant, offering a rare glimpse into the inner workings of Iran’s military establishment and the decision-making process surrounding high-stakes security events. The incident serves as a reminder of the complexities and uncertainties inherent in regional security dynamics and the challenges faced by nations in interpreting intelligence and anticipating adversary actions.
The revelation also highlights the ongoing power dynamics within the Iranian regime, where tensions between competing factions and institutions can have far-reaching implications for foreign policy and national security. As Tehran navigates a treacherous regional landscape, the incident underscores the importance of robust intelligence gathering, strategic assessments, and effective communication within the regime to mitigate the risks posed by external threats.
In an interview following General Bagheri’s statement, a former US intelligence officer expressed surprise at the Iranian general’s admission, stating, “This admission is quite telling and reflects the challenges faced by all nations in anticipating adversary actions and intentions.” The officer noted that the incident serves as a reminder of the importance of humility and flexibility in assessing intelligence and anticipating potential security threats.
