In the small town of Fenwick Island, Delaware, a controversy has emerged over the right of artificial entities to participate in local elections. The issue centers on a long-standing state law that allows corporations, trusts, partnerships, and limited liability companies (LLCs) to vote in local elections if they own land within the municipality.
According to the latest data from Fenwick Island, around 12% of registered voters in the town are artificial entities, including corporations, trusts, and partnerships. Furthermore, it has been reported that these non-human entities cast approximately one-quarter of all votes in the 2024 local election. This phenomenon has raised eyebrows, with many questioning the legitimacy of allowing corporations to have a say in local governance.
The ACLU, or American Civil Liberties Union, has taken notice of the situation and has announced its intention to appeal the case to the Delaware Supreme Court. The organization is concerned that the current law undermines the democratic process and may have unintended consequences. “We believe that the right to vote should be reserved for human beings alone,” said a spokesperson for the ACLU. “Allowing corporations to participate in local elections creates a system of unequal representation, where the interests of artificial entities may take precedence over those of actual residents.”
Critics of the current law argue that it was originally designed to ensure that owners of large tracts of land have a voice in local governance. However, they contend that this exemption has been exploited by corporations and other artificial entities to wield disproportionate influence over local decision-making.
Supporters of the current law, on the other hand, point out that the state legislature has the authority to regulate voting rights and may choose to modify or repeal the existing statute. They also argue that corporations have a legitimate interest in the communities where they operate, as they are taxpayers and contribute to local economies.
The Delaware Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments in the case in the coming months. The outcome will likely have significant implications for local elections across the state and may set a precedent for similar lawsuits elsewhere. As the debate continues, advocates on both sides of the issue remain steadfast in their convictions, with the ACLU urging caution and warning about the dangers of “corporate influence on local politics.”
