Iran has published a map outlining its claimed jurisdiction over the Strategic Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway critical to global energy trade. The move, reportedly issued by Iranian authorities, appears aimed at reinforcing Tehran’s assertion of regional dominance.
According to a recently released document, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has defined the area under its control as extending from southern Iran to parts of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The claimed jurisdiction includes a line drawn between Kuh-e Mobarak in southeastern Iran and the southern part of Fujairah, as well as a second line connecting Qeshm Island to the western part of Umm al-Quwain in the UAE.
The publication of the map has been viewed as a deliberate attempt by Iran to consolidate its control over the strait and demonstrate its military presence in the region. Tensions between Iran and the United States, along with other Western powers, have escalated in recent years due to ongoing disputes over Tehran’s nuclear program and its support for militant groups in the Middle East.
The Strait of Hormuz is a vital artery for global oil production, with approximately one-fifth of global supply passing through its waters. Control of the strait is also a significant strategic asset, given its proximity to major shipping lanes and critical maritime chokepoints.
Commentators have expressed concern that the Iranian claim could exacerbate existing tensions in the region, particularly in light of US-Iran tensions that have been exacerbated by recent incidents, including alleged attacks on oil tankers and Iranian missile strikes on US military bases in Iraq.
The exact status of the strait’s international boundaries has long been a subject of debate, with the UAE and other regional powers maintaining that the strait is part of international waters. However, the Iranian map appears to contradict these assertions by explicitly outlining Tehran’s claimed jurisdiction over the strait.
Iran’s decision to publish its claims may signal an escalation in regional tensions and further underscore its commitment to asserting regional dominance. However, experts caution that the strategic implications of such actions are multifaceted and could have unintended consequences for regional stability and global energy markets.
