In a recent statement, former US President Donald Trump outlined a plan for the United States to take a more active role in securing the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial waterway that connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman. The strait, which is approximately 90 miles long and 30 miles wide, is a vital trade route and a key source of oil for the global market.
According to Trump, the US will “probably” take control of the Strait of Hormuz, with the aim of protecting shipping lanes and preventing Iranian aggression. In return for this role, the Trump administration claims it will seek compensation from the Iranian government.
“We are going to keep the strait,” Trump said. “We will probably run it. We will become the guardian of the strait, and when we do that, we will be reimbursed for it.”
This assertion is based on the US’s historical role in defending the strait, which has been a key component of its regional influence for decades. Trump pointed out that the US has provided military protection for the strait for over 50 years, without receiving any payment from Iran.
“We guarded the strait for 50 years, and we never got paid for it,” Trump said. “We guarded it for nothing, but now we will make money.”
The Trump administration’s plan to seek compensation from Iran has been met with skepticism by some analysts, who point out that the idea of charging a country for security services is unprecedented in international relations.
“That’s a fairly new idea in the world of international politics,” said Dr. James Dorsey, a Middle East analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore. “It’s not clear how far the US can go in implementing this policy, or whether other countries would be willing to follow suit.”
The situation in the Strait of Hormuz has been increasingly volatile in recent years, with several incidents of Iranian naval aggression and the kidnapping of several oil tankers. The Trump administration’s plan to take a more active role in securing the strait is intended to reassure global powers of the US’s commitment to maintaining the free flow of trade through the region.
As tensions between the US and Iran continue to escalate, observers will be closely watching to see how this policy plays out in practice. Will the US be able to secure compensation from Iran, and what implications will this have for the region’s delicate security dynamics?
